<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://prst-per.aps.org/">
    <title>Recent Articles in Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.</title>
    <link>http://prst-per.aps.org/</link>
    <description>Recent articles in Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</description>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>2012-05-16T17:06:21-04:00</syn:updateBase>
    <dc:creator>rss@aps.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:publisher>assocpub@aps.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:date>2012-05-16T17:06:21-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright © 2012 the American Physical Society. Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <prism:copyright>Copyright © 2012 the American Physical Society</prism:copyright>
    <prism:rightsAgent>assocpub@aps.org</prism:rightsAgent>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010123"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010122"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010121"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010120"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010117"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010118"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010115"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010116"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010112"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010113"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010114"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010111"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010110"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010109"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010108"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010106"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010107"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010105"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010104"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010103"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010102"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010101"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020116"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020115"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020114"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020113"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020112"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020111"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020110"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020108"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010123">
    <title>Relations between representational consistency, conceptual understanding of the force concept, and scientific reasoning</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010123</link>
    <description>Author(s): Pasi Nieminen, Antti Savinainen, and Jouni Viiri&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Previous physics education research has raised the question of “hidden variables” behind students’ success in learning certain concepts. In the context of the force concept, it has been suggested that students’ reasoning ability is one such variable. Strong positive correlations between students’ pr...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010123] Published Wed May 16, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Pasi Nieminen, Antti Savinainen, and Jouni Viiri</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  Previous physics education research has raised the question of “hidden variables” behind students’ success in learning certain concepts. In the context of the force concept, it has been suggested that students’ reasoning ability is one such variable. Strong positive correlations between students’ pr...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010123] Published Wed May 16, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Relations between representational consistency, conceptual understanding of the force concept, and scientific reasoning</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Pasi Nieminen, Antti Savinainen, and Jouni Viiri</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-16T10:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010123</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010123 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-16T10:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010123</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010123</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010123</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010122">
    <title>Differences in visual attention between those who correctly and incorrectly answer physics problems</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010122</link>
    <description>Author(s): Adrian M. Madsen, Adam M. Larson, Lester C. Loschky, and N. Sanjay Rebello&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;This study investigated how visual attention differed between those who correctly versus incorrectly answered introductory physics problems. We recorded eye movements of 24 individuals on six different conceptual physics problems where the necessary information to solve the problem was contained in ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010122] Published Fri May 11, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Adrian M. Madsen, Adam M. Larson, Lester C. Loschky, and N. Sanjay Rebello</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  This study investigated how visual attention differed between those who correctly versus incorrectly answered introductory physics problems. We recorded eye movements of 24 individuals on six different conceptual physics problems where the necessary information to solve the problem was contained in ...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010122] Published Fri May 11, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Differences in visual attention between those who correctly and incorrectly answer physics problems</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Adrian M. Madsen, Adam M. Larson, Lester C. Loschky, and N. Sanjay Rebello</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-11T10:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010122</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010122 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-11T10:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010122</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010122</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010122</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010121">
    <title>Developing the learning physical science curriculum: Adapting a small enrollment, laboratory and discussion based physical science course for large enrollments</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010121</link>
    <description>Author(s): Fred Goldberg, Edward Price, Stephen Robinson, Danielle Boyd-Harlow, and Michael McKean&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;We report on the adaptation of the small enrollment, lab and discussion based physical science course, &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Physical Science and Everyday Thinking&lt;/span&gt; (PSET), for a large-enrollment, lecture-style setting. Like PSET, the new &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Learning Physical Science&lt;/span&gt; (LEPS) curriculum was designed around specific principles ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010121] Published Wed May 09, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Fred Goldberg, Edward Price, Stephen Robinson, Danielle Boyd-Harlow, and Michael McKean</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  We report on the adaptation of the small enrollment, lab and discussion based physical science course, <span style="font-style: italic;">Physical Science and Everyday Thinking</span> (PSET), for a large-enrollment, lecture-style setting. Like PSET, the new <span style="font-style: italic;">Learning Physical Science</span> (LEPS) curriculum was designed around specific principles ...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010121] Published Wed May 09, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Developing the learning physical science curriculum: Adapting a small enrollment, laboratory and discussion based physical science course for large enrollments</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Fred Goldberg, Edward Price, Stephen Robinson, Danielle Boyd-Harlow, and Michael McKean</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-09T10:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010121</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010121 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-09T10:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010121</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010121</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010121</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010120">
    <title>Preliminary investigation of instructor effects on gender gap in introductory physics</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010120</link>
    <description>Author(s): Kimberley Kreutzer and Andrew Boudreaux&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gender differences in student learning in the introductory, calculus-based electricity and magnetism course were assessed by administering the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism pre- and postcourse. As expected, male students outgained females in traditionally taught sections as well as ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010120] Published Fri May 04, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Kimberley Kreutzer and Andrew Boudreaux</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  Gender differences in student learning in the introductory, calculus-based electricity and magnetism course were assessed by administering the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism pre- and postcourse. As expected, male students outgained females in traditionally taught sections as well as ...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010120] Published Fri May 04, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Preliminary investigation of instructor effects on gender gap in introductory physics</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Kimberley Kreutzer and Andrew Boudreaux</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-04T10:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010120</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010120 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-04T10:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010120</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010120</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010120</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010117">
    <title>Improving students’ understanding of quantum measurement. I. Investigation of difficulties</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010117</link>
    <description>Author(s): Guangtian Zhu and Chandralekha Singh&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;We describe the difficulties that advanced undergraduate and graduate students have with quantum measurement within the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics. We explore the possible origins of these difficulties by analyzing student responses to questions from both surveys and interviews. Re...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010117] Published Thu Apr 19, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Guangtian Zhu and Chandralekha Singh</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  We describe the difficulties that advanced undergraduate and graduate students have with quantum measurement within the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics. We explore the possible origins of these difficulties by analyzing student responses to questions from both surveys and interviews. Re...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010117] Published Thu Apr 19, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Improving students’ understanding of quantum measurement. I. Investigation of difficulties</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Guangtian Zhu and Chandralekha Singh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-19T10:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010117</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010117 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-19T10:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010117</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010117</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010117</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010118">
    <title>Improving students’ understanding of quantum measurement. II. Development of research-based learning tools</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010118</link>
    <description>Author(s): Guangtian Zhu and Chandralekha Singh&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;We describe the development and implementation of research-based learning tools such as the Quantum Interactive Learning Tutorials and peer-instruction tools to reduce students’ common difficulties with issues related to measurement in quantum mechanics. A preliminary evaluation shows that these lea...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010118] Published Thu Apr 19, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Guangtian Zhu and Chandralekha Singh</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  We describe the development and implementation of research-based learning tools such as the Quantum Interactive Learning Tutorials and peer-instruction tools to reduce students’ common difficulties with issues related to measurement in quantum mechanics. A preliminary evaluation shows that these lea...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010118] Published Thu Apr 19, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Improving students’ understanding of quantum measurement. II. Development of research-based learning tools</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Guangtian Zhu and Chandralekha Singh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-19T10:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010118</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010118 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-19T10:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010118</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010118</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010118</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010115">
    <title>Mapping university students’ epistemic framing of computational physics using network analysis</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010115</link>
    <description>Author(s): Madelen Bodin&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Solving physics problem in university physics education using a computational approach requires knowledge and skills in several domains, for example, physics, mathematics, programming, and modeling. These competences are in turn related to students’ beliefs about the domains as well as about learnin...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010115] Published Tue Apr 10, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Madelen Bodin</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  Solving physics problem in university physics education using a computational approach requires knowledge and skills in several domains, for example, physics, mathematics, programming, and modeling. These competences are in turn related to students’ beliefs about the domains as well as about learnin...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010115] Published Tue Apr 10, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Mapping university students’ epistemic framing of computational physics using network analysis</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Madelen Bodin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-10T10:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010115</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010115 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-10T10:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010115</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010115</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010115</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010116">
    <title>Learning, retention, and forgetting of Newton’s third law throughout university physics</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010116</link>
    <description>Author(s): Eleanor C. Sayre, Scott V. Franklin, Stephanie Dymek, Jessica Clark, and Yifei Sun&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;We present data from a between-student study on student response to questions on Newton’s third law given in two introductory calculus-based physics classes (Mechanics and Electromagnetism) at a large northeastern university. Construction of a response curve reveals subtle dynamics in student learni...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010116] Published Tue Apr 10, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Eleanor C. Sayre, Scott V. Franklin, Stephanie Dymek, Jessica Clark, and Yifei Sun</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  We present data from a between-student study on student response to questions on Newton’s third law given in two introductory calculus-based physics classes (Mechanics and Electromagnetism) at a large northeastern university. Construction of a response curve reveals subtle dynamics in student learni...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010116] Published Tue Apr 10, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Learning, retention, and forgetting of Newton’s third law throughout university physics</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Eleanor C. Sayre, Scott V. Franklin, Stephanie Dymek, Jessica Clark, and Yifei Sun</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-10T10:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010116</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010116 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-10T10:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010116</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010116</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010116</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010112">
    <title>Disciplinary authenticity: Enriching the reforms of introductory physics courses for life-science students</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010112</link>
    <description>Author(s): Jessica Watkins, Janet E. Coffey, Edward F. Redish, and Todd J. Cooke&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Educators and policy makers have advocated for reform of undergraduate biology education, calling for greater integration of mathematics and physics in the biology curriculum. While these calls reflect the increasingly interdisciplinary nature of biology research, crossing disciplinary boundaries in...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010112] Published Wed Apr 04, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Jessica Watkins, Janet E. Coffey, Edward F. Redish, and Todd J. Cooke</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  Educators and policy makers have advocated for reform of undergraduate biology education, calling for greater integration of mathematics and physics in the biology curriculum. While these calls reflect the increasingly interdisciplinary nature of biology research, crossing disciplinary boundaries in...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010112] Published Wed Apr 04, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Disciplinary authenticity: Enriching the reforms of introductory physics courses for life-science students</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Jessica Watkins, Janet E. Coffey, Edward F. Redish, and Todd J. Cooke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-04T10:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010112</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010112 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-04T10:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010112</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010112</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010112</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010113">
    <title>Exploration of factors that affect the comparative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives in an undergraduate laboratory</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010113</link>
    <description>Author(s): Jacquelyn J. Chini, Adrian Madsen, Elizabeth Gire, N. Sanjay Rebello, and Sadhana Puntambekar&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Recent research results have failed to support the conventionally held belief that students learn physics best from hands-on experiences with physical equipment. Rather, studies have found that students who perform similar experiments with computer simulations perform as well or better on measures o...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010113] Published Wed Apr 04, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Jacquelyn J. Chini, Adrian Madsen, Elizabeth Gire, N. Sanjay Rebello, and Sadhana Puntambekar</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  Recent research results have failed to support the conventionally held belief that students learn physics best from hands-on experiences with physical equipment. Rather, studies have found that students who perform similar experiments with computer simulations perform as well or better on measures o...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010113] Published Wed Apr 04, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Exploration of factors that affect the comparative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives in an undergraduate laboratory</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Jacquelyn J. Chini, Adrian Madsen, Elizabeth Gire, N. Sanjay Rebello, and Sadhana Puntambekar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-04T10:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010113</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010113 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-04T10:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010113</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010113</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010113</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010114">
    <title>Using time-on-task measurements to understand student performance in a physics class: A four-year study</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010114</link>
    <description>Author(s): John Stewart, Gay Stewart, and Jennifer Taylor&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Student use of out-of-class time was measured for four years in the introductory second-semester calculus-based physics course at the University of Arkansas. Two versions of the course were presented during the time of the measurement. In both versions, the total out-of-class time a student invested...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010114] Published Wed Apr 04, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): John Stewart, Gay Stewart, and Jennifer Taylor</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  Student use of out-of-class time was measured for four years in the introductory second-semester calculus-based physics course at the University of Arkansas. Two versions of the course were presented during the time of the measurement. In both versions, the total out-of-class time a student invested...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010114] Published Wed Apr 04, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Using time-on-task measurements to understand student performance in a physics class: A four-year study</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>John Stewart, Gay Stewart, and Jennifer Taylor</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-04T10:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010114</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010114 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-04T10:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010114</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010114</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010114</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010111">
    <title>Observations on student difficulties with mathematics in upper-division electricity and magnetism</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010111</link>
    <description>Author(s): Rachel E. Pepper, Stephanie V. Chasteen, Steven J. Pollock, and Katherine K. Perkins&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;We discuss common difficulties in upper-division electricity and magnetism (E&amp;amp;M) in the areas of Gauss’s law, vector calculus, and electric potential using both quantitative and qualitative evidence. We also show that many of these topical difficulties may be tied to student difficulties with ma...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010111] Published Tue Mar 27, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Rachel E. Pepper, Stephanie V. Chasteen, Steven J. Pollock, and Katherine K. Perkins</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  We discuss common difficulties in upper-division electricity and magnetism (E&amp;M) in the areas of Gauss’s law, vector calculus, and electric potential using both quantitative and qualitative evidence. We also show that many of these topical difficulties may be tied to student difficulties with ma...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010111] Published Tue Mar 27, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Observations on student difficulties with mathematics in upper-division electricity and magnetism</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Rachel E. Pepper, Stephanie V. Chasteen, Steven J. Pollock, and Katherine K. Perkins</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-27T10:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010111</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010111 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-27T10:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010111</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010111</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010111</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010110">
    <title>Prospective elementary teachers’ perceptions of the processes of modeling: A case study</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010110</link>
    <description>Author(s): Claudio Fazio, Benedetto Di Paola, and Ivan Guastella&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this paper we discuss a study on the approaches to modeling of students of the 4-year elementary school teacher program at the University of Palermo, Italy. The answers to a specially designed questionnaire are analyzed on the basis of an &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;a priori&lt;/span&gt; analysis made using a general scheme of reference...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010110] Published Thu Mar 15, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Claudio Fazio, Benedetto Di Paola, and Ivan Guastella</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  In this paper we discuss a study on the approaches to modeling of students of the 4-year elementary school teacher program at the University of Palermo, Italy. The answers to a specially designed questionnaire are analyzed on the basis of an <span style="font-style: italic;">a priori</span> analysis made using a general scheme of reference...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010110] Published Thu Mar 15, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Prospective elementary teachers’ perceptions of the processes of modeling: A case study</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Claudio Fazio, Benedetto Di Paola, and Ivan Guastella</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-15T10:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010110</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010110 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-15T10:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010110</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010110</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010110</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010109">
    <title>How do they solve it? An insight into the learner’s approach to the mechanism of physics problem solving</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010109</link>
    <description>Author(s): Balasubrahmanya Hegde and B. N. Meera&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;A perceived difficulty is associated with physics problem solving from a learner’s viewpoint, arising out of a multitude of reasons. In this paper, we have examined the microstructure of students’ thought processes during physics problem solving by combining the analysis of responses to multiple-cho...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010109] Published Fri Mar 09, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Balasubrahmanya Hegde and B. N. Meera</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  A perceived difficulty is associated with physics problem solving from a learner’s viewpoint, arising out of a multitude of reasons. In this paper, we have examined the microstructure of students’ thought processes during physics problem solving by combining the analysis of responses to multiple-cho...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010109] Published Fri Mar 09, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>How do they solve it? An insight into the learner’s approach to the mechanism of physics problem solving</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Balasubrahmanya Hegde and B. N. Meera</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-09T10:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010109</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010109 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-09T10:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010109</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010109</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010109</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010108">
    <title>Role of beliefs and emotions in numerical problem solving in university physics education</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010108</link>
    <description>Author(s): Madelen Bodin and Mikael Winberg&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Numerical problem solving in classical mechanics in university physics education offers a learning situation where students have many possibilities of control and creativity. In this study, expertlike beliefs about physics and learning physics together with prior knowledge were the most important pr...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010108] Published Wed Feb 29, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Madelen Bodin and Mikael Winberg</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  Numerical problem solving in classical mechanics in university physics education offers a learning situation where students have many possibilities of control and creativity. In this study, expertlike beliefs about physics and learning physics together with prior knowledge were the most important pr...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010108] Published Wed Feb 29, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Role of beliefs and emotions in numerical problem solving in university physics education</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Madelen Bodin and Mikael Winberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-29T10:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010108</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010108 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-29T10:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010108</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010108</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010108</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010106">
    <title>Scientific reasoning abilities of nonscience majors in physics-based courses</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010106</link>
    <description>Author(s): J. Christopher Moore and Louis J. Rubbo&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;We have found that non-STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) majors taking either a conceptual physics or astronomy course at two regional comprehensive institutions score significantly lower preinstruction on the Lawson’s Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning (LCTSR) in comparis...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010106] Published Wed Feb 15, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): J. Christopher Moore and Louis J. Rubbo</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  We have found that non-STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) majors taking either a conceptual physics or astronomy course at two regional comprehensive institutions score significantly lower preinstruction on the Lawson’s Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning (LCTSR) in comparis...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010106] Published Wed Feb 15, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Scientific reasoning abilities of nonscience majors in physics-based courses</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>J. Christopher Moore and Louis J. Rubbo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-15T10:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010106</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010106 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-15T10:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010106</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010106</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010106</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010107">
    <title>Effects of two different types of physics learning on the results of CLASS test</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010107</link>
    <description>Author(s): Mirko Marušić and Josip Sliško&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;During a one-semester-long research project with high school students, we deployed and gauged efficiency of two different reform teaching methods: reading, presenting, and questioning (RPQ) and experimenting and discussion (ED). In this paper we report on changes in students’ attitudes and beliefs a...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010107] Published Wed Feb 15, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Mirko Marušić and Josip Sliško</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  During a one-semester-long research project with high school students, we deployed and gauged efficiency of two different reform teaching methods: reading, presenting, and questioning (RPQ) and experimenting and discussion (ED). In this paper we report on changes in students’ attitudes and beliefs a...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010107] Published Wed Feb 15, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Effects of two different types of physics learning on the results of CLASS test</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Mirko Marušić and Josip Sliško</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-15T10:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010107</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010107 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-15T10:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010107</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010107</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010107</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010105">
    <title>Epistemic complexity and the journeyman-expert transition</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010105</link>
    <description>Author(s): Thomas J. Bing and Edward F. Redish&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Physics students can encounter difficulties in physics problem solving as a result of failing to use knowledge that they have but do not perceive as relevant or appropriate. In previous work we have demonstrated that some of these difficulties may be epistemological. Students may limit the kinds of ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010105] Published Fri Feb 10, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Thomas J. Bing and Edward F. Redish</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  Physics students can encounter difficulties in physics problem solving as a result of failing to use knowledge that they have but do not perceive as relevant or appropriate. In previous work we have demonstrated that some of these difficulties may be epistemological. Students may limit the kinds of ...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010105] Published Fri Feb 10, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Epistemic complexity and the journeyman-expert transition</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Thomas J. Bing and Edward F. Redish</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-10T10:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010105</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010105 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-10T10:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010105</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010105</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010105</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010104">
    <title>Applying beliefs and resources frameworks to the psychometric analyses of an epistemology survey</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010104</link>
    <description>Author(s): Sevda Yerdelen-Damar, Andrew Elby, and Ali Eryilmaz&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;This study explored how researchers’ views about the form of students’ epistemologies influence how the researchers develop and refine surveys and how they interpret survey results. After running standard statistical analyses on 505 physics students’ responses to the Turkish version of the Maryland ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010104] Published Wed Feb 08, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Sevda Yerdelen-Damar, Andrew Elby, and Ali Eryilmaz</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  This study explored how researchers’ views about the form of students’ epistemologies influence how the researchers develop and refine surveys and how they interpret survey results. After running standard statistical analyses on 505 physics students’ responses to the Turkish version of the Maryland ...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010104] Published Wed Feb 08, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Applying beliefs and resources frameworks to the psychometric analyses of an epistemology survey</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Sevda Yerdelen-Damar, Andrew Elby, and Ali Eryilmaz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-08T10:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010104</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010104 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-08T10:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010104</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010104</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010104</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010103">
    <title>Controlled study on the effectiveness of multimedia learning modules for teaching mechanics</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010103</link>
    <description>Author(s): Homeyra R. Sadaghiani&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;We have investigated the impact of using multimedia learning modules (MLM) on the learning of students enrolled in introductory physics courses at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. One hundred fifty-nine students were randomly registered in two sections of an introductory mechanics co...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010103] Published Fri Feb 03, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Homeyra R. Sadaghiani</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  We have investigated the impact of using multimedia learning modules (MLM) on the learning of students enrolled in introductory physics courses at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. One hundred fifty-nine students were randomly registered in two sections of an introductory mechanics co...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010103] Published Fri Feb 03, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Controlled study on the effectiveness of multimedia learning modules for teaching mechanics</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Homeyra R. Sadaghiani</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-03T10:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010103</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010103 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-03T10:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010103</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010103</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010103</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010102">
    <title>Positive attitudinal shifts with the Physics by Inquiry curriculum across multiple implementations</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010102</link>
    <description>Author(s): Beth A. Lindsey, Leonardo Hsu, Homeyra Sadaghiani, Jack W. Taylor, and Karen Cummings&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Recent publications have documented positive attitudinal shifts on the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS) among students enrolled in courses with an explicit epistemological focus. We now report positive attitudinal shifts in classes using the &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Physics by Inquiry&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;PbI&lt;/span&gt;) curriculu...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010102] Published Mon Jan 30, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Beth A. Lindsey, Leonardo Hsu, Homeyra Sadaghiani, Jack W. Taylor, and Karen Cummings</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  Recent publications have documented positive attitudinal shifts on the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS) among students enrolled in courses with an explicit epistemological focus. We now report positive attitudinal shifts in classes using the <span style="font-style: italic;">Physics by Inquiry</span> (<span style="font-style: italic;">PbI</span>) curriculu...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010102] Published Mon Jan 30, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Positive attitudinal shifts with the Physics by Inquiry curriculum across multiple implementations</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Beth A. Lindsey, Leonardo Hsu, Homeyra Sadaghiani, Jack W. Taylor, and Karen Cummings</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-30T10:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010102</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010102 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-30T10:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010102</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010102</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010102</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010101">
    <title>Investigating student communities with network analysis of interactions in a physics learning center</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010101</link>
    <description>Author(s): Eric Brewe, Laird Kramer, and Vashti Sawtelle&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Developing a sense of community among students is one of the three pillars of an overall reform effort to increase participation in physics, and the sciences more broadly, at Florida International University. The emergence of a research and learning community, embedded within a course reform effort,...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010101] Published Thu Jan 12, 2012</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Eric Brewe, Laird Kramer, and Vashti Sawtelle</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  Developing a sense of community among students is one of the three pillars of an overall reform effort to increase participation in physics, and the sciences more broadly, at Florida International University. The emergence of a research and learning community, embedded within a course reform effort,...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010101] Published Thu Jan 12, 2012</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Investigating student communities with network analysis of interactions in a physics learning center</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Eric Brewe, Laird Kramer, and Vashti Sawtelle</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-12T10:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010101</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010101 (2012)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-12T10:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010101</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010101</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>010101</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020116">
    <title>Investigating the effectiveness of the tutorials in introductory physics in multiple instructional settings</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020116</link>
    <description>Author(s): C. Slezak, K. M. Koenig, R. J. Endorf, and G. A. Braun&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;This paper examines the educational impact of the implementation of the tutorial activity “Changes in Energy and Momentum” from &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;The Tutorials in Introductory Physics&lt;/span&gt; in five different instructional settings. These settings include (1) a completely computer-based learning environment and (2) use of c...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020116] Published Thu Dec 29, 2011</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): C. Slezak, K. M. Koenig, R. J. Endorf, and G. A. Braun</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  This paper examines the educational impact of the implementation of the tutorial activity “Changes in Energy and Momentum” from <span style="font-style: italic;">The Tutorials in Introductory Physics</span> in five different instructional settings. These settings include (1) a completely computer-based learning environment and (2) use of c...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020116] Published Thu Dec 29, 2011</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Investigating the effectiveness of the tutorials in introductory physics in multiple instructional settings</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>C. Slezak, K. M. Koenig, R. J. Endorf, and G. A. Braun</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-29T10:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020116</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020116 (2011)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2011-12-29T10:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020116</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020116</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>020116</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020115">
    <title>Teaching electric circuits with multiple batteries: A qualitative approach</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020115</link>
    <description>Author(s): David P. Smith and Paul van Kampen&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;We have investigated preservice science teachers’ qualitative understanding of circuits consisting of multiple batteries in single and multiple loops using a pretest and post-test method and classroom observations. We found that most students were unable to explain the effects of adding batteries in...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020115] Published Tue Nov 15, 2011</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): David P. Smith and Paul van Kampen</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  We have investigated preservice science teachers’ qualitative understanding of circuits consisting of multiple batteries in single and multiple loops using a pretest and post-test method and classroom observations. We found that most students were unable to explain the effects of adding batteries in...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020115] Published Tue Nov 15, 2011</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Teaching electric circuits with multiple batteries: A qualitative approach</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>David P. Smith and Paul van Kampen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-15T10:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020115</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020115 (2011)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2011-11-15T10:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020115</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020115</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>020115</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020114">
    <title>How attitudes and beliefs about physics change from high school to faculty</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020114</link>
    <description>Author(s): Simon P. Bates, Ross K. Galloway, Claire Loptson, and Katherine A. Slaughter&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;We present results of a pseudolongitudinal study of attitudes and beliefs about physics from different cohort groups ranging from final-year high school students in the UK to physics faculty (&lt;span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;N&lt;/span&gt;=637&lt;/span&gt;), using the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS) instrument. In terms of overall d...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020114] Published Tue Nov 08, 2011</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Simon P. Bates, Ross K. Galloway, Claire Loptson, and Katherine A. Slaughter</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  We present results of a pseudolongitudinal study of attitudes and beliefs about physics from different cohort groups ranging from final-year high school students in the UK to physics faculty (<span><span style="font-style: italic;">N</span>=637</span>), using the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS) instrument. In terms of overall d...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020114] Published Tue Nov 08, 2011</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>How attitudes and beliefs about physics change from high school to faculty</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Simon P. Bates, Ross K. Galloway, Claire Loptson, and Katherine A. Slaughter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-08T10:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020114</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020114 (2011)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2011-11-08T10:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020114</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020114</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>020114</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020113">
    <title>Wave-particle duality and uncertainty principle: Phenomenographic categories of description of tertiary physics students’ depictions</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020113</link>
    <description>Author(s): Mengesha Ayene, Jeanne Kriek, and Baylie Damtie&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Quantum mechanics is often thought to be a difficult subject to understand, not only in the complexity of its mathematics but also in its conceptual foundation. In this paper we emphasize students’ depictions of the uncertainty principle and wave-particle duality of quantum events, phenomena that co...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020113] Published Thu Nov 03, 2011</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Mengesha Ayene, Jeanne Kriek, and Baylie Damtie</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  Quantum mechanics is often thought to be a difficult subject to understand, not only in the complexity of its mathematics but also in its conceptual foundation. In this paper we emphasize students’ depictions of the uncertainty principle and wave-particle duality of quantum events, phenomena that co...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020113] Published Thu Nov 03, 2011</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Wave-particle duality and uncertainty principle: Phenomenographic categories of description of tertiary physics students’ depictions</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Mengesha Ayene, Jeanne Kriek, and Baylie Damtie</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-03T10:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020113</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020113 (2011)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2011-11-03T10:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020113</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020113</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>020113</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020112">
    <title>Systematic study of student understanding of the relationships between the directions of force, velocity, and acceleration in one dimension</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020112</link>
    <description>Author(s): Rebecca Rosenblatt and Andrew F. Heckler&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;We developed an instrument to systematically investigate student conceptual understanding of the relationships between the directions of net force, velocity, and acceleration in one dimension and report on data collected on the final version of the instrument from over 650 students. Unlike previous ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020112] Published Wed Nov 02, 2011</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Rebecca Rosenblatt and Andrew F. Heckler</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  We developed an instrument to systematically investigate student conceptual understanding of the relationships between the directions of net force, velocity, and acceleration in one dimension and report on data collected on the final version of the instrument from over 650 students. Unlike previous ...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020112] Published Wed Nov 02, 2011</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Systematic study of student understanding of the relationships between the directions of force, velocity, and acceleration in one dimension</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Rebecca Rosenblatt and Andrew F. Heckler</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-02T10:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020112</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020112 (2011)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2011-11-02T10:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020112</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020112</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>020112</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020111">
    <title>Comparative study of the effectiveness of three learning environments: Hyper-realistic virtual simulations, traditional schematic simulations and traditional laboratory</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020111</link>
    <description>Author(s): Guadalupe Martínez, Francisco L. Naranjo, Ángel L. Pérez, Maria Isabel Suero, and Pedro J. Pardo&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;This study compared the educational effects of computer simulations developed in a hyper-realistic virtual environment with the educational effects of either traditional schematic simulations or a traditional optics laboratory. The virtual environment was constructed on the basis of &lt;span style="font-variant: small-caps;"&gt;Java&lt;/span&gt; applets com...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020111] Published Mon Oct 31, 2011</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Guadalupe Martínez, Francisco L. Naranjo, Ángel L. Pérez, Maria Isabel Suero, and Pedro J. Pardo</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  This study compared the educational effects of computer simulations developed in a hyper-realistic virtual environment with the educational effects of either traditional schematic simulations or a traditional optics laboratory. The virtual environment was constructed on the basis of <span style="font-variant: small-caps;">Java</span> applets com...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020111] Published Mon Oct 31, 2011</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Comparative study of the effectiveness of three learning environments: Hyper-realistic virtual simulations, traditional schematic simulations and traditional laboratory</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Guadalupe Martínez, Francisco L. Naranjo, Ángel L. Pérez, Maria Isabel Suero, and Pedro J. Pardo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-31T10:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020111</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020111 (2011)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2011-10-31T10:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020111</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020111</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>020111</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020110">
    <title>Assessing expertise in introductory physics using categorization task</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020110</link>
    <description>Author(s): Andrew Mason and Chandralekha Singh&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;The ability to categorize problems based upon underlying principles, rather than surface features or contexts, is considered one of several proxy predictors of expertise in problem solving. With inspiration from the classic study by Chi, Feltovich, and Glaser, we assess the distribution of expertise...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020110] Published Fri Oct 21, 2011</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Andrew Mason and Chandralekha Singh</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  The ability to categorize problems based upon underlying principles, rather than surface features or contexts, is considered one of several proxy predictors of expertise in problem solving. With inspiration from the classic study by Chi, Feltovich, and Glaser, we assess the distribution of expertise...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020110] Published Fri Oct 21, 2011</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Assessing expertise in introductory physics using categorization task</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Mason and Chandralekha Singh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-21T10:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020110</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020110 (2011)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2011-10-21T10:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020110</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020110</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>020110</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020108">
    <title>Utilizing public scientific web lectures to teach contemporary physics at the high school level: A case study of learning</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020108</link>
    <description>Author(s): Shulamit Kapon, Uri Ganiel, and Bat Sheva Eylon&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;This paper describes a teaching experiment designed to examine the learning (i.e., retention of content and conceptual development) that takes place when public scientific web lectures delivered by scientists are utilized to present advanced ideas in physics to students with a high school background...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020108] Published Mon Oct 17, 2011</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author(s): Shulamit Kapon, Uri Ganiel, and Bat Sheva Eylon</p><p><img src="http://publish.aps.org/images/icons/creativecommons.png" width="30" height="30" alt="Creative Commons"/>  This paper describes a teaching experiment designed to examine the learning (i.e., retention of content and conceptual development) that takes place when public scientific web lectures delivered by scientists are utilized to present advanced ideas in physics to students with a high school background...</p><p>[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020108] Published Mon Oct 17, 2011</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Utilizing public scientific web lectures to teach contemporary physics at the high school level: A case study of learning</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Shulamit Kapon, Uri Ganiel, and Bat Sheva Eylon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-17T10:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020108</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020108 (2011)</dc:source>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:publicationDate>2011-10-17T10:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:doi>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020108</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020108</prism:url>
    <prism:startingPage>020108</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

