<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://prst-per.aps.org/">
    <title>Recent Articles in Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.</title>
    <link>http://prst-per.aps.org/</link>
    <description>Recent articles in  Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright (c) 2008 The American Physical Society</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2008-05-14T14:15:58-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:publisher>assocpub@aps.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>rss@aps.org</dc:creator>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>4</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>2008-05-14T14:15:58-04:00</syn:updateBase>
    <prism:rightsAgent>rss@aps.org</prism:rightsAgent>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010108"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010107"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010106"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010105"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010104"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010103"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010102"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010101"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020110"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020109"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020108"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020107"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020001"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020106"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020105"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020104"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020103"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020102"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.029901"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020101"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.019901"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010109"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010108"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010107"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010106"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010105"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010104"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010103"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010102"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010101"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010108">
    <title>Impact of a conventional introductory laboratory course on the understanding of measurement</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010108</link>
    <description>Author(s): Trevor S. Volkwyn, Saalih Allie, Andy Buffler, and Fred Lubben&lt;br/&gt;Conventional physics laboratory courses generally include an emphasis on increasing students&#8217; ability to carry out data analysis according to scientific practice, in particular, those aspects that relate to measurement uncertainty. This study evaluates the efficacy of the conventional approach by ...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 4, 010108] Published Thu May 01, 2008</description>
    <dc:creator>Trevor S. Volkwyn, Saalih Allie, Andy Buffler, and Fred Lubben</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-01T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010108</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 010108</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>1</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>010108</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010107">
    <title>How students learn from multiple contexts and definitions: Proper time as a coordination class</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010107</link>
    <description>Author(s): Olivia Levrini and Andrea A. diSessa&lt;br/&gt;This article provides an empirical analysis of a single classroom episode in which students reveal difficulties with the concept of proper time in special relativity but slowly make progress in improving their understanding. The theoretical framework used is &#8220;coordination class theory,&#8221; which is...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 4, 010107] Published Wed Apr 23, 2008</description>
    <dc:creator>Olivia Levrini and Andrea A. diSessa</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-23T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010107</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 010107</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>1</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2008-04-23T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>010107</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010106">
    <title>Reliability, compliance, and security in web-based course assessments</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010106</link>
    <description>Author(s): Scott Bonham&lt;br/&gt;Pre- and postcourse assessment has become a very important tool for education research in physics and other areas. The web offers an attractive alternative to in-class paper administration, but concerns about web-based administration include reliability due to changes in medium, student compliance r...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 4, 010106] Published Tue Apr 15, 2008</description>
    <dc:creator>Scott Bonham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-15T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010106</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 010106</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>1</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2008-04-15T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>010106</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010105">
    <title>Assessing student expertise in introductory physics with isomorphic problems. II. Effect of some potential factors on problem solving and transfer</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010105</link>
    <description>Author(s): Chandralekha Singh&lt;br/&gt;In this paper, we explore the use of isomorphic problem pairs (IPPs) to assess introductory physics students&#8217; ability to solve and successfully transfer problem-solving knowledge from one context to another in mechanics. We call the paired problems &#8220;isomorphic&#8221; because they require the same ph...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 4, 010105] Published Fri Mar 28, 2008</description>
    <dc:creator>Chandralekha Singh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-03-28T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010105</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 010105</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>1</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2008-03-28T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>010105</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010104">
    <title>Assessing student expertise in introductory physics with isomorphic problems. I. Performance on nonintuitive problem pair from introductory physics</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010104</link>
    <description>Author(s): Chandralekha Singh&lt;br/&gt;Investigations related to expertise in problem solving and ability to transfer learning from one context to another are important for developing strategies to help students perform more expertlike tasks. Here we analyze written responses to a pair of nonintuitive isomorphic problems given to introdu...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 4, 010104] Published Fri Mar 28, 2008</description>
    <dc:creator>Chandralekha Singh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-03-28T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010104</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 010104</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>1</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2008-03-28T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>010104</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010103">
    <title>Why we should teach the Bohr model and how to teach it effectively</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010103</link>
    <description>Author(s): S. B. McKagan, K. K. Perkins, and C. E. Wieman&lt;br/&gt;Some education researchers have claimed that we should not teach the Bohr model of the atom because it inhibits students&#8217; ability to learn the true quantum nature of electrons in atoms. Although the evidence for this claim is weak, many have accepted it. This claim has implications for how to pres...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 4, 010103] Published Thu Mar 06, 2008</description>
    <dc:creator>S. B. McKagan, K. K. Perkins, and C. E. Wieman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-03-06T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010103</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 010103</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>1</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2008-03-06T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>010103</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010102">
    <title>Measuring student learning with item response theory</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010102</link>
    <description>Author(s): Young-Jin Lee, David J. Palazzo, Rasil Warnakulasooriya, and David E. Pritchard&lt;br/&gt;We investigate short-term learning from hints and feedback in a Web-based physics tutoring system. Both the skill of students and the difficulty and discrimination of items were determined by applying item response theory (IRT) to the first answers of students who are working on for-credit homework ...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 4, 010102] Published Thu Jan 31, 2008</description>
    <dc:creator>Young-Jin Lee, David J. Palazzo, Rasil Warnakulasooriya, and David E. Pritchard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-01-31T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010102</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 010102</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>1</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2008-01-31T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>010102</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010101">
    <title>Gesture analysis for physics education researchers</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010101</link>
    <description>Author(s): Rachel E. Scherr&lt;br/&gt;Systematic observations of student gestures can not only fill in gaps in students&#8217; verbal expressions, but can also offer valuable information about student ideas, including their source, their novelty to the speaker, and their construction in real time. This paper provides a review of the researc...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 4, 010101] Published Fri Jan 25, 2008</description>
    <dc:creator>Rachel E. Scherr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-01-25T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010101</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 010101</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>1</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2008-01-25T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>010101</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020110">
    <title>Physics faculty beliefs and values about the teaching and learning of problem solving. II. Procedures for measurement and analysis</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020110</link>
    <description>Author(s): Charles Henderson, Edit Yerushalmi, Vince H. Kuo, Kenneth Heller, and Patricia Heller&lt;br/&gt;To identify and describe the basis upon which instructors make curricular and pedagogical decisions, we have developed an artifact-based interview and an analysis technique based on multilayered concept maps. The policy capturing technique used in the interview asks instructors to make judgments abo...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 020110] Published Wed Dec 12, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>Charles Henderson, Edit Yerushalmi, Vince H. Kuo, Kenneth Heller, and Patricia Heller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-12T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020110</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 020110</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-12-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>020110</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020109">
    <title>Physics faculty beliefs and values about the teaching and learning of problem solving. I. Mapping the common core</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020109</link>
    <description>Author(s): E. Yerushalmi, C. Henderson, K. Heller, P. Heller, and V. Kuo&lt;br/&gt;In higher education, instructors&#8217; choices of both curricular material and pedagogy are determined by their beliefs about learning and teaching, the values of their profession, and perceived external constraints. Dissemination of research-based educational reforms is based on assumptions about that...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 020109] Published Wed Dec 12, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>E. Yerushalmi, C. Henderson, K. Heller, P. Heller, and V. Kuo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-12T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020109</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 020109</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-12-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>020109</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020108">
    <title>Phenomenographic study of students&#8217; problem solving approaches in physics</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020108</link>
    <description>Author(s): Laura N. Walsh, Robert G. Howard, and Brian Bowe&lt;br/&gt;This paper describes ongoing research investigating student approaches to quantitative and qualitative problem solving in physics. This empirical study was conducted using a phenomenographic approach to analyze data from individual semistructured problem solving interviews with 22 introductory colle...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 020108] Published Wed Dec 12, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>Laura N. Walsh, Robert G. Howard, and Brian Bowe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-12T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020108</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 020108</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-12-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>020108</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020107">
    <title>Applying clustering to statistical analysis of student reasoning about two-dimensional kinematics</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020107</link>
    <description>Author(s): R. Padraic Springuel, Michael C. Wittmann, and John R. Thompson&lt;br/&gt;We use clustering, an analysis method not presently common to the physics education research community, to group and characterize student responses to written questions about two-dimensional kinematics. Previously, clustering has been used to analyze multiple-choice data; we analyze free-response da...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 020107] Published Mon Dec 03, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>R. Padraic Springuel, Michael C. Wittmann, and John R. Thompson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-03T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020107</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 020107</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-12-03T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>020107</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020001">
    <title>Editorial: Which Wei Wang?</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020001</link>
    <description>Author(s): Gene D. Sprouse&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 020001] Published Mon Dec 03, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>Gene D. Sprouse</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-03T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020001</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 020001</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-12-03T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>020001</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>EDITORIALS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>EDITORIALS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020106">
    <title>Acting like a physicist: Student approach study to experimental design</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020106</link>
    <description>Author(s): Anna Karelina and Eugenia Etkina&lt;br/&gt;National studies of science education have unanimously concluded that preparing our students for the demands of the 21st century workplace is one of the major goals. This paper describes a study of student activities in introductory college physics labs, which were designed to help students acquire ...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 020106] Published Fri Oct 19, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>Anna Karelina and Eugenia Etkina</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-10-19T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020106</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 020106</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-10-19T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>020106</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020105">
    <title>Comparing three methods for teaching Newton&#8217;s third law</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020105</link>
    <description>Author(s): Trevor I. Smith and Michael C. Wittmann&lt;br/&gt;Although guided-inquiry methods for teaching introductory physics have been individually shown to be more effective at improving conceptual understanding than traditional lecture-style instruction, researchers in physics education have not studied differences among reform-based curricula in much det...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 020105] Published Thu Oct 18, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>Trevor I. Smith and Michael C. Wittmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-10-18T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020105</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 020105</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-10-18T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>020105</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020104">
    <title>Analogical scaffolding and the learning of abstract ideas in physics: Empirical studies</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020104</link>
    <description>Author(s): Noah S. Podolefsky and Noah D. Finkelstein&lt;br/&gt;Previously, we proposed a model of student reasoning which combines the roles of representation, analogy, and layering of meaning&#8212;analogical scaffolding [Podolefsky and Finkelstein, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 010109 (2007)]. The present empirical studies build on this model to examine its u...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 020104] Published Fri Sep 14, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>Noah S. Podolefsky and Noah D. Finkelstein</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-09-14T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020104</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 020104</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-09-14T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>020104</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020103">
    <title>Announcement: Teacher Preparation Book</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020103</link>
    <description>Author(s):  Anonymous&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 020103] Published Tue Sep 11, 2007</description>
    <dc:date>2007-09-11T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020103</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 020103</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-09-11T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>020103</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>EDITORIALS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>EDITORIALS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020102">
    <title>Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020102</link>
    <description>Author(s): Charles Henderson and Melissa H. Dancy&lt;br/&gt;Many proven research-based instructional strategies have been developed for introductory college-level physics. Significant efforts to disseminate these strategies have focused on convincing individual instructors to give up their traditional practices in favor of particular research-based practices...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 020102] Published Fri Sep 07, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>Charles Henderson and Melissa H. Dancy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-09-07T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020102</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 020102</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-09-07T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>020102</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.029901">
    <title>Publisher's Note: Strongly and weakly directed approaches to teaching multiple representation use in physics [Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 010108 (2007)]</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.029901</link>
    <description>Author(s): Patrick B. Kohl, David Rosengrant, and Noah D. Finkelstein&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 029901] Published Fri Aug 03, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>Patrick B. Kohl, David Rosengrant, and Noah D. Finkelstein</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-03T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.029901</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 029901</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-08-03T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>029901</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ERRATA</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ERRATA</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020101">
    <title>Elements of a cognitive model of physics problem solving: Epistemic games</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020101</link>
    <description>Author(s): Jonathan Tuminaro and Edward F. Redish&lt;br/&gt;Although much is known about the differences between expert and novice problem solvers, knowledge of those differences typically does not provide enough detail to help instructors understand why some students seem to learn physics while solving problems and others do not. A critical issue is how stu...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 020101] Published Fri Jul 06, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>Jonathan Tuminaro and Edward F. Redish</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-07-06T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020101</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 020101</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-07-06T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>020101</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.019901">
    <title>Publisher's Note: Strongly and weakly directed approaches to teaching multiple representation use in physics [Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 010108 (2007)]</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.019901</link>
    <description>Author(s): Patrick B. Kohl, David Rosengrant, and Noah D. Finkelstein&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 019901] Published Wed Jun 20, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>Patrick B. Kohl, David Rosengrant, and Noah D. Finkelstein</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-06-20T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.019901</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 019901</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>1</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-06-20T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>019901</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ERRATA</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ERRATA</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010109">
    <title>Analogical scaffolding and the learning of abstract ideas in physics: An example from electromagnetic waves</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010109</link>
    <description>Author(s): Noah S. Podolefsky and Noah D. Finkelstein&lt;br/&gt;This paper describes a model of analogy, analogical scaffolding, which explains present and prior results of student learning with analogies. We build on prior models of representation, blending, and layering of ideas. Extending this model&#8217;s explanatory power, we propose ways in which the model ca...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 010109] Published Fri Jun 15, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>Noah S. Podolefsky and Noah D. Finkelstein</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-06-15T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010109</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 010109</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>1</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-06-15T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>010109</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010108">
    <title>Strongly and weakly directed approaches to teaching multiple representation use in physics</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010108</link>
    <description>Author(s): Patrick B. Kohl, David Rosengrant, and Noah D. Finkelstein&lt;br/&gt;Good use of multiple representations is considered key to learning physics, and so there is considerable motivation both to learn how students use multiple representations when solving problems and to learn how best to teach problem solving using multiple representations. In this study of two large-...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 010108] Published Tue Jun 12, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>Patrick B. Kohl, David Rosengrant, and Noah D. Finkelstein</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-06-12T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010108</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 010108</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>1</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-06-12T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>010108</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010107">
    <title>Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom: How sufficient is interactive engagement?</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010107</link>
    <description>Author(s): Steven J. Pollock, Noah D. Finkelstein, and Lauren E. Kost&lt;br/&gt;Previous research [Lorenzo , Am. J. Phys. 74, 118 (2006)] demonstrated that the difference in performance between male and female students can be reduced and even eliminated, in consistent fashion, by using interactive engagement techniques in the introductory physics classroom. The present paper de...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 010107] Published Tue Jun 05, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>Steven J. Pollock, Noah D. Finkelstein, and Lauren E. Kost</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-06-05T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010107</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 010107</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>1</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-06-05T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>010107</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010106">
    <title>Interpreting force concept inventory scores: Normalized gain and SAT scores</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010106</link>
    <description>Author(s): Vincent P. Coletta, Jeffrey A. Phillips, and Jeffrey J. Steinert&lt;br/&gt;Preinstruction SAT scores and normalized gains (G) on the force concept inventory (FCI) were examined for individual students in interactive engagement (IE) courses in introductory mechanics at one high school (N=335) and one university (N=292) , and strong, positive correlations were found for both...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 010106] Published Wed May 23, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>Vincent P. Coletta, Jeffrey A. Phillips, and Jeffrey J. Steinert</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-05-23T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010106</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 010106</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>1</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-05-23T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>010106</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010105">
    <title>Using conceptual metaphor and functional grammar to explore how language used in physics affects student learning</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010105</link>
    <description>Author(s): David T. Brookes and Eugenia Etkina&lt;br/&gt;This paper introduces a theory about the role of language in learning physics. The theory is developed in the context of physics students and physicists talking and writing about the subject of quantum mechanics. We found that physicists&#8217; language encodes different varieties of analogical models t...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 010105] Published Tue May 15, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>David T. Brookes and Eugenia Etkina</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-05-15T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010105</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 010105</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>1</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-05-15T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>010105</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010104">
    <title>Effectiveness of different tutorial recitation teaching methods and its implications for TA training</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010104</link>
    <description>Author(s): Kathleen M. Koenig, Robert J. Endorf, and Gregory A. Braun&lt;br/&gt;We present results from a comparative study of student understanding for students who attended recitation classes that used different teaching methods. Student volunteers from our introductory calculus-based physics course attended a special recitation class that was taught using one of four differe...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 010104] Published Tue May 15, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>Kathleen M. Koenig, Robert J. Endorf, and Gregory A. Braun</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-05-15T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010104</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 010104</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>1</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-05-15T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>010104</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010103">
    <title>Framework for articulating instructional practices and conceptions</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010103</link>
    <description>Author(s): Melissa Dancy and Charles Henderson&lt;br/&gt;We present and describe the development of a framework for assessing or categorizing instructional practices and related conceptions in the context of introductory physics instruction. The purpose of the framework is for articulating practices and conceptions of individual instructors or of curricul...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 010103] Published Tue May 15, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>Melissa Dancy and Charles Henderson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-05-15T00:00:00-04:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010103</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 010103</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>1</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-05-15T00:00:00-04:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>010103</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010102">
    <title>Context sensitivity in the force concept inventory</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010102</link>
    <description>Author(s): John Stewart, Heather Griffin, and Gay Stewart&lt;br/&gt;The force concept inventory and a 10-question context-modified test were given to 647 students enrolled in introductory physics classes at the University of Arkansas. Context changes had an effect ranging from &#8722;3% to 10% on the individual questions. The average student score on the ten transformed...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 010102] Published Fri Feb 02, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>John Stewart, Heather Griffin, and Gay Stewart</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-02-02T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010102</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 010102</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>1</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-02-02T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>010102</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010101">
    <title>Correlations between student discussion behavior, attitudes, and learning</title>
    <link>http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010101</link>
    <description>Author(s): Gerd Kortemeyer&lt;br/&gt;An important result of physics education research is that students&#8217; learning and success in a course is correlated with their beliefs, attitudes, and expectations regarding physics. However, it is hard to assess these beliefs for individual students, and traditional survey instruments such as the ...&lt;br/&gt;[Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 010101] Published Tue Jan 30, 2007</description>
    <dc:creator>Gerd Kortemeyer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-01-30T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Personal use only, all commercial or other reuse prohibited</dc:rights>
    <dc:identifier>10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010101</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 3, 010101</dc:source>
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:type>article</dc:type>
    <prism:publicationName>Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:issueIdentifier>1</prism:issueIdentifier>
    <prism:publicationDate>2007-01-30T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:startingPage>010101</prism:startingPage>
    <dc:subject>ARTICLES</dc:subject>
    <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>
